Regarding the litigants\' overall right to bail, the court asked them to continue their case in custody because bail is restricted under the legislation they were charged with breaking.
In the first case, only the first, second, and third respondents were charged, according to the examiner\'s record. The first litigant was filling in as a Framework Overseer at the Aqaki Kaliti sub-city locale 05, and the second respondent was an associate assessor at the sub-city land improvement and the board office. They conspired with the third respondent, who works independently in their area and is an extraordinary member in defilment, to obtain ill-advised benefits for themselves, and they illegally sold Mr. Gedei Gebre Ghidiabhe
Regarding the litigants\' overall right to bail, the court asked them to continue their case in custody because bail is restricted under the legislation they were charged with breaking.
In the first case, only the first, second, and third respondents were charged, according to the examiner\'s record. The first litigant was filling in as a Framework Overseer at the Aqaki Kaliti sub-city locale 05, and the second respondent was an associate assessor at the sub-city land improvement and the board office. They conspired with the third respondent, who works independently in their area and is an extraordinary member in defilment, to obtain ill-advised benefits for themselves, and they illegally sold Mr. Gedei Gebre Ghidiabheer\'s place of business in
In the first case, only the first, second, and third respondents were charged, according to the examiner\'s record. The first litigant was filling in as a Framework Overseer at the Aqaki Kaliti sub-city locale 05, and the second respondent was an associate assessor at the sub-city land improvement and the board office. They conspired with the third respondent, who works independently in their area and is an extraordinary member in defilment, to obtain ill-advised benefits for themselves, and they illegally sold Mr. Gedei Gebre Ghidiabhe
Regarding the litigants\' overall right to bail, the court asked them to continue their case in custody because bail is restricted under the legislation they were charged with breaking.
In the first case, only the first, second, and third respondents were charged, according to the examiner\'s record. The first litigant was filling in as a Framework Overseer at the Aqaki Kaliti sub-city locale 05, and the second respondent was an associate assessor at the sub-city land improvement and the board office. They conspired with the third respondent, who works independently in their area and is an extraordinary member in defilment, to obtain ill-advised benefits for themselves, and they illegally sold Mr. Gedei Gebre Ghidiabheer\'s place of business in
- Category
- Various
Commenting disabled.